|
Dec 14,2005, 11:40 PM
|
#1 | | Tactless since 2004
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: KW
Posts: 2,863
| A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
I'm playing a $1/2 NL live cash game the other day at Kelly's Place (Shameless plug for West Side Poker Club) and the following hand occured. I'd like to know your thoughts.
Anyway, the hand in question.
4 players limp to the flop. I'll list the 3 that matter.
Player A 7d9d ($140)
Player B AJo ($60)
Player C A9o ($57)
Flop Ac 8d 6d
Player B bets $8
Player C raises to $16
Player A is last to act and calls $16
Player B re-raises all in for another $44
Player C calls the all in
Player A    ?
Is this an automatic call from Player A for most of you? Play it as if you were at the table, figuring everything out in your head and having a limited amount of time. Give me your honest answer within 30 seconds....
stp
__________________
I typically bet that my luck is better than your skill.
|
| |
Dec 14,2005, 11:46 PM
|
#2 | | Living Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,079
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
easy call
__________________
13Cards is the worst thing to happen to Canadian Poker ever.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 12:45 AM
|
#3 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 508
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
30 second limit? I call in less than 1.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 12:55 AM
|
#4 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,517
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
Beats everyone into the pot. I think I'd prefer to come over the top instead of just calling the first $16 but this worked out better.
__________________
sirwatts.blogspot.com
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 04:47 AM
|
#5 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 733
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
yep this is a no-brainer in my mind... when was this hand  i don't remember...
__________________
'weak tight' - 2006 Royal Cup Champions - Team Waterloo
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 06:09 AM
|
#6 | | SHIP IT, BITCHES!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,388
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
Yep. Easy call. I'd only be afraid of someone else with spades but not really against 2 players. You are at almost 50% to win the hand and only have to put up a third of the cash. Plus it's a cash game!
__________________
I can't tell you how awesome it feels to win a WSOP bracelet!
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 08:22 AM
|
#7 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Beanie42
Posts: 2,560
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
In a heart-beat. I've already hit one straight-flush at Kelly's
__________________
"So many losses with such a small bankroll against such weak opponents - it's like being beaten by a mob of toddlers" - Me (while learning ring games) |
| |
Dec 15,2005, 08:28 AM
|
#8 | | SHIP IT, BITCHES!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,388
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
Who is player C? What the hell was he thinking? When is he playing again
Next time, don't tell us their hands. Just give us a range you would expect them to be playing.
__________________
I can't tell you how awesome it feels to win a WSOP bracelet!
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 08:48 AM
|
#9 | | Two time Royal Cup Champs | Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
I'm tight, I hate losing money, I call in a second!
__________________
I have a simple philosophy: Fill what's empty. Empty what's full. Scratch where it itches.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 09:06 AM
|
#10 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Beanie42
Posts: 2,560
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act) Quote: |
Originally Posted by pkrfce9 Who is player C? What the hell was he thinking? When is he playing again  | Be nice Greg - lots of people over-play A9, some quite profitably  . (and no, I wasn't player C - this time!)
__________________
"So many losses with such a small bankroll against such weak opponents - it's like being beaten by a mob of toddlers" - Me (while learning ring games) |
| |
Dec 15,2005, 09:11 AM
|
#11 | | wtf, you called w/ that?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,038
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
Easy Call...
I was at the table for the Big suck out with AJo....
I think it was a very WEAK play for the str/flush draw not to push all in on the flop after the first raise and reraise from the second player.
The situation outside the cards were;
1; rock
2; new and aggressive (had bet the first three or four hands, layed down a huge pair and lost in showdown twice)
3; over aggressive
I think the best play here was for the rock to push, so that the good agressive has to call two reraises. He would have trapped the over aggressive player, and made the stronger player fold.
__________________
Ofcourse I call, my cards are soooooooted.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 10:42 AM
|
#12 | | Tactless since 2004
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: KW
Posts: 2,863
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act) Quote: |
Originally Posted by pkrfce9 Who is player C? What the hell was he thinking? When is he playing again
Next time, don't tell us their hands. Just give us a range you would expect them to be playing. | I had thought about not putting the suits in the OP but wanted to really post what Player A was likely thinking. It would have been easy for him to put both B and C on a medium-big Ace, possibly even two pair. I was surprised at his call here, I suppose if it was a tournament things might have been different. Tyson said after the hand that I (AJo) was the underdog even though I was ahead. I wasn't sure about that until I figured out that he had 16 outs x2 (PlayerC had a diamond). Anyway the river came duece duece not diamonds and I took down the pot.
Player C btw, I was surprised at his hand also.....he usually plays TWO THREE!
stp
__________________
I typically bet that my luck is better than your skill.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 12:27 PM
|
#13 | | Living Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,079
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act) Quote: |
Originally Posted by stpboy Quote: |
Originally Posted by pkrfce9 Who is player C? What the hell was he thinking? When is he playing again
Next time, don't tell us their hands. Just give us a range you would expect them to be playing. | I had thought about not putting the suits in the OP but wanted to really post what Player A was likely thinking. It would have been easy for him to put both B and C on a medium-big Ace, possibly even two pair. I was surprised at his call here, I suppose if it was a tournament things might have been different. Tyson said after the hand that I (AJo) was the underdog even though I was ahead. I wasn't sure about that until I figured out that he had 16 outs x2 (PlayerC had a diamond). Anyway the river came duece duece not diamonds and I took down the pot.
Player C btw, I was surprised at his hand also.....he usually plays TWO THREE!
stp | Dude, what has happened to you? I thought you knew all about outs and odds and stuff.. these last few posts you've made make me think you are either running really badly or maybe you should take a break from poker for awhile...
I don't remember disagreeing with you so much in advice from previous threads..
__________________
13Cards is the worst thing to happen to Canadian Poker ever.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 12:46 PM
|
#14 | | Tactless since 2004
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: KW
Posts: 2,863
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
I'm actually running really well to be honest, I just rarely think that a drawing hand is the favourite. I dunno, it was a split second call from him and after the fact I didn't give it much thought. Until wayyyy after the fact. I would have made the same call as him I'm sure in a cash game but not have thought that I was the favourite, I usually don't think that until I'm actually ahead in the hand and on the board. I kinda posted this because Tyson has(d) said that I sucked out on the 7d9d hand. I was ahead the whole time in the hand but behind in odds...I understand now, there is a big difference. We can continue to disagree because really, all that matters...is that you're awesome.
stp
__________________
I typically bet that my luck is better than your skill.
|
| |
Dec 15,2005, 01:00 PM
|
#15 | | Living Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,079
| Re: A NL hand for review (30 seconds to act)
Just remember theres always a difference between being the favourite and having a pot equity edge.
The latter is far more important than the former.
__________________
13Cards is the worst thing to happen to Canadian Poker ever.
|
| | |