Hellmuth's Mole

I agree that Chan was very good. That other final would have been fantastic but as tight as the table played we may have been there until 4 am.

I would like to try some HORSE that's not available there but it's certainly not a deal breaker from me participating at Chan again.

Quimby

Great job on the league. I appreciate your efforts.

I'll be honest with you. I didn't play a single hand on Chan besides the forum tournaments. I have enough poker sites already. I'm hoping I don't have to make a new account on a new poker site every 4-5 months.

My suggestion is to use the bigger sites. I don't know what perks you get being an affiliate but I don't imagine it's much from 30 people signing up on a site. I do hope it's more in the future, by the way.

Just my input.

CanadaDave

Chan seems to offer near everything we require.

My only complaint is the hand history isn't software based, it is through a webpage. That's a slight pain; but totally livable.

Thanks Graham for the hard work I'm sure it took getting the Chan League going. I think it should be considered a success.

If you start up a new league I will definitely be playing more often. Was tough in the winter to make the games due to the timing; but that shouldn't be a problem this summer.

__________________
If at first you don't succeed... well... so much for skydiving.

pokerJAH

How about double belly busters?

Chuckieland

what about you gather some list
and let us pick
i would say, unless you can offer rakeback to the member, i definely stay away from the rakeback site.
for me, if new site offer rakeback, i'll have to signup with rakeback affiliate.