You have a new PM! Click here here to read it!

Go Back   Poker Forum Canada > Poker Forum > Poker Strategy > Limit Holdem

Limit Holdem This forum is for Limit Holdem Strategy



Register Now!
Old Jun 10,2008, 01:47 PM   #1
Full PFC Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,377
SB steals

I hate these spots. Open folded to you in SB. Not fun playing vs either a TAG or LAG in the BB and a LP isn't fantastic either.

Against TAGs I can certainly open fold a bigger range, since postflop can be tough against decent players, but on the upside, a steal may work more often.

LAGs are prone to defend and 3 bet light (as are some TAGs). LP's almost never fold preflop so the steal aspect is fairly ineffective.

That being said, hands like Kx, Qxs, Q7+, Jxs, J8+, etc. should be decent vs. random holdings, but the positional disadvantage is a real pain.

Are there ever justifiable reasons to open limp in SB?

In general, do you find your open raising range to be bigger from the button (vs 2 potential callers but in position), or from the SB (with only 1 person to steal from, but being OOP).

In short, I'm caught between the dilemma of being too passive and giving too many walks, vs getting 3 bet and then missing and playing OOP.

I posted this in Limit, mainly because I'm only talking about these situations in general, not a HU game in particular. As well, there is a big difference between a full (or 6 max) game playing from the SB than playing from the SB (button) in a HU game.

Thoughts?
ScoobyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10,2008, 03:12 PM   #2
Full PFC Member
 
actyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,823
Visit actyper's Twitter
Good discussion, because these scenarios come up pretty often. I've been experimenting with both open limping and raising these troubled hands. I have a feeling its a losing spot in either scenario but I can't confirm as I play most of limit without PT compatability.
actyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11,2008, 06:00 PM   #3
Full PFC Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,377
Hmm...figured I'd do a little Pokertracker review to see how terrible I'm doing in the blinds. Basically filtered a weaker range of hands (ie a steal range that discounts legitimate hands). K9-, Q9-, J9-, T8-, any 9 through 3.

Then basically looked at my steal from SB for these hands, as well as my defend in BB with these.

Shockingly, my BB/hand was +0.12 from the SB in these spots, and my defend from BB was -0.30 (when I called/raised from BB HU). Both significantly better than folding.

Pretty damn respectable I think, but we all know results don't mean that much.

If anything I wonder now if I really should be opening up my range for both stealing and defending (of course a lot of that is going to depend on WHO you're stealing/defending against).

I'll see if I can find some interesting hands...
ScoobyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11,2008, 07:05 PM   #4
Full PFC Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,377
Here's a few recent steal/defends, not that interesting I guess, but IMO we need more common/crap BvB posts since these hands are bread and butter for HU play which happens a lot (in 6 max anyways). Comments welcome.

Hand 1:
Villian is around 50/12/1.3 Not super crazy aggro, but pretty loose and seems like he goes to showdown a lot paying off with some pretty weak holdings. I figure flop peel is pretty standard with overs and BD draws, bluffing/semibluffing into this guy seems a bit wasteful since he's never folding.

POKERSTARS GAME #18057132967: HOLD'EM LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2008/06/10 - 23:09:26 (ET)
Table 'Indus' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: colincal ($123 in chips)
Seat 2: $4Duke ($92 in chips)
Seat 3: rocketman73 ($78 in chips)
Seat 4: DTDDog ($130.50 in chips)
Seat 5: ScoobyD ($296 in chips)
Seat 6: ZimCity_Slim ($165 in chips)
DTDDog: posts small blind $1
ScoobyD: posts big blind $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ScoobyD [9c Qh]
ZimCity_Slim: folds
colincal: folds
$4Duke: raises $3 to $6
rocketman73: folds
DTDDog: folds
ScoobyD: calls $3
*** FLOP *** [3c 5c Ts]
ScoobyD: checks
$4Duke: bets $3
ScoobyD: calls $3
*** TURN *** [3c 5c Ts] [Ac]
ScoobyD: checks
$4Duke: bets $6
ScoobyD: calls $6
*** RIVER *** [3c 5c Ts Ac] [6c]
ScoobyD: bets $6
$4Duke: calls $6
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ScoobyD: shows [9c Qh] (a flush, Ace high)
$4Duke: mucks hand
ScoobyD collected $41 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $43 | Rake $2
Board [3c 5c Ts Ac 6c]
Seat 1: colincal folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: $4Duke mucked [7h 7c]
Seat 3: rocketman73 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: DTDDog (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: ScoobyD (big blind) showed [9c Qh] and won ($41) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 6: ZimCity_Slim folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Hand 2: Villian is 70/15/1 over a small number of hands, frequently going to SD (and losing). Seems much more passive postflop than pre.

I never know how to play draws. Sometimes I'll just call the flop (moreso against LAGs that 3 bet any pair, draw, ace relentlessly). I prefer to keep draws cheap vs. LAGs, since I can never seem to actually force a fold, and they almost always will lead into you if you do hit (often 3 betting light on a bigger flush draw, or figuring you for a semibluff). LP's you can sort of bully into at least getting a free turn, TAG's are tougher, and I'm thinking I need to add the peel flop, raise/CR turn as that's much more likely to get a TAG to fold than a flop raise.

I decided to take the free card on the turn, as it changed nothing, and figured naked aces are apt to look me up there. River seems standard mainly cause I can't imagine too many worse hands calling the raise (although this villian might be able to with an underpair or an A).

POKERSTARS GAME #18056376983: HOLD'EM LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2008/06/10 - 22:30:24 (ET)
Table 'Lucretia' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: jackie21716 ($649.50 in chips)
Seat 2: scottyjr81 ($40 in chips)
Seat 3: Zeweb ($31 in chips)
Seat 4: duffam123 ($140 in chips)
Seat 5: physicsdh2 ($111 in chips)
Seat 6: ScoobyD ($341 in chips)
physicsdh2: posts small blind $1
ScoobyD: posts big blind $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ScoobyD [2h 9h]
jackie21716: folds
scottyjr81: folds
Zeweb: folds
duffam123: folds
physicsdh2: raises $3 to $6
ScoobyD: calls $3
*** FLOP *** [3c Qh 4h]
physicsdh2: bets $3
ScoobyD: raises $3 to $6
physicsdh2: calls $3
*** TURN *** [3c Qh 4h] [3d]
physicsdh2: checks
ScoobyD: checks
*** RIVER *** [3c Qh 4h 3d] [9c]
physicsdh2: bets $6
ScoobyD: calls $6
*** SHOW DOWN ***
physicsdh2: shows [Ad Th] (a pair of Threes)
ScoobyD: shows [2h 9h] (two pair, Nines and Threes)
ScoobyD collected $35 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $36 | Rake $1
Board [3c Qh 4h 3d 9c]
Seat 1: jackie21716 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: scottyjr81 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Zeweb folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: duffam123 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: physicsdh2 (small blind) showed [Ad Th] and lost with a pair of Threes
Seat 6: ScoobyD (big blind) showed [2h 9h] and won ($35) with two pair, Nines and Threes

Hand 3: Villian is 53/13/1.3. Seems fairly spewy bad but not crazy aggro.
I usually don't get too fancy with turn CR's especially with vulnerable top pair hands with draws on the board, but figure I need to mix it in, since I'm often leading the flop regardless (and I feel his peeling range is a lot of gutshots, overs, aces), so I figure if I show weakness on the turn I can get in my CR for value. I just can never find TP folds against spewy players...

POKERSTARS GAME #18057073110: HOLD'EM LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2008/06/10 - 23:06:14 (ET)
Table 'Eurydome' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 2: Beelzbub03 ($323.50 in chips)
Seat 3: whodey62 ($106 in chips)
Seat 4: sitter72 ($79 in chips)
Seat 6: ScoobyD ($320.50 in chips)
ScoobyD: posts small blind $1
Beelzbub03: posts big blind $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ScoobyD [Jd 9h]
whodey62: folds
sitter72: folds
ScoobyD: raises $3 to $6
Beelzbub03: calls $3
*** FLOP *** [7d 5c 9s]
ScoobyD: bets $3
Beelzbub03: calls $3
*** TURN *** [7d 5c 9s] [3h]
ScoobyD: checks
Beelzbub03: bets $6
ljones7 joins the table at seat #5
ScoobyD: raises $6 to $12
Beelzbub03: raises $6 to $18
ScoobyD: calls $6
*** RIVER *** [7d 5c 9s 3h] [8d]
ScoobyD: checks
Beelzbub03: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ScoobyD: shows [Jd 9h] (a pair of Nines)
Beelzbub03: shows [3c 9c] (two pair, Nines and Threes)
Beelzbub03 collected $52 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $54 | Rake $2
Board [7d 5c 9s 3h 8d]
Seat 2: Beelzbub03 (big blind) showed [3c 9c] and won ($52) with two pair, Nines and Threes
Seat 3: whodey62 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: sitter72 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: ScoobyD (small blind) showed [Jd 9h] and lost with a pair of Nines

Hand 4: Villian is a 50/13/0.4 LP calling station fish. He'll go to SD light.

I figure 2nd barrel might fold out the odd naked ace, charge draws , other worse overcards...but probably not against this opponent. When he calls turn he's either got a hand he's showing down (any pair or an A), or he has a draw (which often got there with the 6 hitting), so I throw in the towel...

POKERSTARS GAME #18054474766: HOLD'EM LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2008/06/10 - 20:50:51 (ET)
Table 'Lucretia' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: stan0717 ($157 in chips)
Seat 2: alec309 ($73 in chips)
Seat 3: Boooooty L ($365.50 in chips)
Seat 4: SteadyHands ($130 in chips)
Seat 5: RottenTeeth ($57.50 in chips)
Seat 6: ScoobyD ($267 in chips)
ScoobyD: posts small blind $1
stan0717: posts big blind $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ScoobyD [3d Kc]
alec309: folds
Boooooty L: folds
SteadyHands: folds
RottenTeeth: folds
ScoobyD: raises $3 to $6
stan0717: calls $3
*** FLOP *** [4s 5h Th]
ScoobyD: bets $3
stan0717: calls $3
*** TURN *** [4s 5h Th] [5s]
ScoobyD: bets $6
stan0717: calls $6
*** RIVER *** [4s 5h Th 5s] [6c]
ScoobyD: checks
stan0717: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ScoobyD: shows [3d Kc] (a pair of Fives)
stan0717: shows [3h 3s] (two pair, Fives and Threes)
stan0717 collected $29 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $30 | Rake $1
Board [4s 5h Th 5s 6c]
Seat 1: stan0717 (big blind) showed [3h 3s] and won ($29) with two pair, Fives and Threes
Seat 2: alec309 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Boooooty L folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: SteadyHands folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: RottenTeeth (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: ScoobyD (small blind) showed [3d Kc] and lost with a pair of Fives


Hand 5: Villian is 79/6/0.6. Calling station fishy. I can't decide if I should be cutting down my steal range vs these guys (since they can't fold) or if I should just play everything since they're bound to make so many mistakes postflop that I should be able to show a profit...even out of position.

POKERSTARS GAME #18055168084: HOLD'EM LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2008/06/10 - 21:26:37 (ET)
Table 'Lucretia' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: nayrballen6 ($56 in chips)
Seat 2: Wortel2000 ($65 in chips)
Seat 3: rocketman73 ($108 in chips)
Seat 4: SteadyHands ($135.50 in chips)
Seat 5: JB371 ($91 in chips)
Seat 6: ScoobyD ($369.50 in chips)
ScoobyD: posts small blind $1
nayrballen6: posts big blind $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ScoobyD [Jc 6c]
Wortel2000: folds
rocketman73: folds
SteadyHands: folds
JB371: folds
ScoobyD: raises $3 to $6
nayrballen6: calls $3
*** FLOP *** [6h Qc 2s]
ScoobyD: bets $3
nayrballen6: calls $3
*** TURN *** [6h Qc 2s] [Jh]
ScoobyD: bets $6
nayrballen6: raises $6 to $12
ScoobyD: raises $6 to $18
nayrballen6: calls $6
*** RIVER *** [6h Qc 2s Jh] [3s]
ScoobyD: bets $6
nayrballen6: calls $6
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ScoobyD: shows [Jc 6c] (two pair, Jacks and Sixes)
nayrballen6: mucks hand
ScoobyD collected $64 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $66 | Rake $2
Board [6h Qc 2s Jh 3s]
Seat 1: nayrballen6 (big blind) mucked [Js 8s]
Seat 2: Wortel2000 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: rocketman73 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: SteadyHands folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: JB371 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: ScoobyD (small blind) showed [Jc 6c] and won ($64) with two pair, Jacks and Sixes
ScoobyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drunk Woman Steals Ambulance and has "Pretty Good Time" Graham Off Topic Lounge 1 Dec 13,2009 05:25 PM
A tale of 2 blind steals... ScoobyD Online Poker Talk 1 Apr 04,2006 12:31 PM

 
Top Sites
Winner Poker

250% up to $2,000
Bonus Code: Canada
 
PokerStars

$600 FREE
Marketing Code: PSA8177
 
Party Poker

100% up to $500 FREE
Bonus Code: CANADA2012
 

Poker Stars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Poker Forum Canada offers bonuses for many online poker sites. Party Poker Bonus Code is the best Canadian poker bonus with  Titan Poker Bonus Code being the second best and last but not least is PokerStars Marketing Code. Clearing the full bonus on each site will add a total of $1,700 in bonus cash to your online bankroll.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.