You have a new PM! Click here here to read it!

Go Back   Poker Forum Canada > Poker Forum > Poker Strategy > Pot Limit and No Limit Omaha

Pot Limit and No Limit Omaha Omaha is growing with Popularity! This section is for all Pot Limit and No Limit Omaha discussion.



Register Now!
Old Jul 29,2008, 12:08 AM   #1
Administrator
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,755
Stupid play, or good decision?

Alright, so I flopped the nuts, but it was a very drawy board. In this situation do you think its best to slow play the nuts, or try and get all the money in on the flop? Discuss.

Note, this is like my 4th hand at this table, so no reads.

Full Tilt Poker Game #7419829645: Table Wilkinson (6 max) - $0.50/$1 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 0:52:48 ET - 2008/07/29
Seat 1: obv ($262.85)
Seat 2: brbgraham ($79)
Seat 3: MADGREEK614 ($337.60)
Seat 4: yquiet ($97.50)
Seat 5: roundedout ($60)
Seat 6: Ed Longshanks ($50)
brbgraham posts the small blind of $0.50
MADGREEK614 posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to brbgraham [Js Ah Qh Ad]
yquiet folds
roundedout folds
Ed Longshanks folds
obv raises to $3.50
brbgraham calls $3
MADGREEK614 calls $2.50
*** FLOP *** [As Qc 6c]
brbgraham checks
MADGREEK614 checks
obv bets $9

Do you jam here, or try and hope for a crappy turn then check raise?

Results in white:
brbgraham raises to $37.50
MADGREEK614 has 15 seconds left to act
MADGREEK614 folds
obv has 15 seconds left to act
obv raises to $123
brbgraham calls $38, and is all in
obv shows [Ac 6d 6h 9c]
brbgraham shows [Js Ah Qh Ad]
Uncalled bet of $47.50 returned to obv
*** TURN *** [As Qc 6c] [Kd]
*** RIVER *** [As Qc 6c Kd] [8s]
obv shows three of a kind, Sixes
brbgraham shows three of a kind, Aces
brbgraham wins the pot ($158.50) with three of a kind, Aces
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $161.50 | Rake $3
Board: [As Qc 6c Kd 8s]
Seat 1: obv (button) showed [Ac 6d 6h 9c] and lost with three of a kind, Sixes
Seat 2: brbgraham (small blind) showed [Js Ah Qh Ad] and won ($158.50) with three of a kind, Aces
Seat 3: MADGREEK614 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: yquiet didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: roundedout didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: Ed Longshanks didn't bet (folded)

Last edited by Graham; Jul 29,2008 at 12:10 AM.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 08:34 AM   #2
It's phonetic!
 
DrTyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,080

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award Single Win Award Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 4

You have to bet that board to protect your hand IMO

It's got a flush draw and a straight draw out there.... you can actually be a dog in this hand, but also, if the guy has a hand like two pair or a set, a bad card is not only going to make you nervous about your hand, but also cool any action you may get now.

Mark
__________________
Life's usually simple, just not always easy
DrTyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 11:32 AM   #3
Local Celebrity
 
Wetts1012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Looking for Reasons to Fold
Posts: 3,838

PFC Tournament Wins
Single Win Award Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 2

Graham - based on your previous hand posts I would expect a reraise PF with this hand? Doesnt make sense that you would want to smallball here.

You got the desired result either way, so WD.
Wetts1012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 11:43 AM   #4
Administrator
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetts1012 View Post
Graham - based on your previous hand posts I would expect a reraise PF with this hand? Doesnt make sense that you would want to smallball here.

You got the desired result either way, so WD.
I actually think I am improving my game thanks to some of your feedback. Also, I spent about 4 hours watching PLO training videos on Real Poker Training (shameless plug) on the weekend, so I think this is actually helping big time. The PLO instructor (David Eisenstein) from the videos gives a lot of good advice, and I am actually tightening up BIGTIME on my starting hand selection. Also, he says raising pre-flop is pointless (esp. with AAXX) as all you really have is a pair of aces. By limping with this hand, it disguises it against a lot of really bad players. I know some of my past HH have been awful, but I really am trying to improve by posting them here. I appreciate all your feedback regardless of how negative it is.

With this particular hand, I think I over played it a little, because I didn't have much of a redraw, unless the board paired. There were many cards that would have my hand beat on the turn or the river, but like Mark said, I was trying to protect it here, as from the limited hands I had seen with the opponent, he was playing very LAG. Fortunately no club came, and I was good, but he could have just as easily been on straight and flush draws which would have made my play more dangerous.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 01:20 PM   #5
Forum Troll - Admin Style
 
westside8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Valuetown
Posts: 5,239

PFC Tournament Wins
Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 1

Visit westside8's Twitter
I think I like re-raising preflop here...but in this spot, just jam - too many cards can come on the turn to kill your action or cause you to bite your nails.
westside8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 01:23 PM   #6
It's phonetic!
 
DrTyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,080

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award Single Win Award Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 4

IMO

Cash game - call

Tourney - push

EDIT - Pre-flop that is...

Mark
__________________
Life's usually simple, just not always easy

Last edited by DrTyore; Jul 29,2008 at 01:58 PM.
DrTyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 03:33 PM   #7
SHIP IT, BITCHES!
 
pkrfce9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,388
mark, jamming PF is not possible (without some help from your opponents)

CR jamming on the flop is not possible, so i don't like going for the CR here.

i would lead out on the flop and hope to be able to re-raise jam. you want the money in now with what is undoubtedly the best hand and has re-draws if someone draws out anyway. what's the worst hand you can be against? something like Kc Jc Ts 9s? you are still a slight favourite against that. get the money in ASAP, cause he's not always going to have the worst possible hand against you. you don't know what cards will cause him to shut down (or make it hard for you to call)...

training is a great idea but i think you have misunderstood some of your training. you have a lot more than just AAxx PF, you have a premium hand. if there is a chance you can get the bulk of your stack in PF, i would go for the re-raise and the re-re-raise push.
__________________
I can't tell you how awesome it feels to win a WSOP bracelet!

Last edited by pkrfce9; Jul 29,2008 at 03:45 PM.
pkrfce9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29,2008, 04:23 PM   #8
Administrator
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkrfce9 View Post
training is a great idea but i think you have misunderstood some of your training. you have a lot more than just AAxx PF, you have a premium hand. if there is a chance you can get the bulk of your stack in PF, i would go for the re-raise and the re-re-raise push.
Very true... Its gonna take some trial and error to work out these kinks, but thanks everyone for the advice.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 07:50 AM   #9
It's phonetic!
 
DrTyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,080

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award Single Win Award Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkrfce9 View Post
mark, jamming PF is not possible (without some help from your opponents)

CR jamming on the flop is not possible, so i don't like going for the CR here.

i would lead out on the flop and hope to be able to re-raise jam. you want the money in now with what is undoubtedly the best hand and has re-draws if someone draws out anyway. what's the worst hand you can be against? something like Kc Jc Ts 9s? you are still a slight favourite against that. get the money in ASAP, cause he's not always going to have the worst possible hand against you. you don't know what cards will cause him to shut down (or make it hard for you to call)...

training is a great idea but i think you have misunderstood some of your training. you have a lot more than just AAxx PF, you have a premium hand. if there is a chance you can get the bulk of your stack in PF, i would go for the re-raise and the re-re-raise push.
I'm aware that jamming isn't possible without help in PLOM, but he had a chance to re-raise here, and didn't. I was saying I like to do that with AAxx in PLOM (even a 2x suited one sometimes) cash games, but in a MTT / SNG, I'm re-raising 100%

As for the flop, hero has the current nuts, but if villain has a hand like say, KcJc10s9s, he is actually a favorite (3xK, 3xJ, 3x10, 7xclubs, as well as two runner draws, so let's add another two outs there).

Mark
__________________
Life's usually simple, just not always easy
DrTyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 08:31 AM   #10
Living Legend
 
BBC Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,079
Quote:
Also, he says raising pre-flop is pointless (esp. with AAXX) as all you really have is a pair of aces
I probably would have hit stop on the video as soon as I heard that. You can pretty much say that any hand you are ever dealt is 'really just four cards'.

The point in Omaha is to create large pots when you have good hands in position and play small ones when you aren't.

Also, slowplaying in a pot limit game is wrong. By not increasing the max bet on the flop you limit your winnings on the turn/riv. So regardless of how strong your hand is, if you want to win a big pot you need to be betting.

Quote:
As for the flop, hero has the current nuts, but if villain has a hand like say, KcJc10s9s, he is actually a favorite (3xK, 3xJ, 3x10, 7xclubs, as well as two runner draws, so let's add another two outs there).
Yes in the worst case scenario, but I'm not sure how you'd ever learn that unless he tables his hand out of turn.
__________________
13Cards is the worst thing to happen to Canadian Poker ever.
BBC Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 10:31 AM   #11
Cash games are evil!
 
pokerJAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
worth the money? too bad they don't let you see the video listing before becoming a member.
__________________
Vegas June 15 -19
pokerJAH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 11:31 AM   #12
Administrator
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC Z View Post
The point in Omaha is to create large pots when you have good hands in position and play small ones when you aren't.
True, but I think that also depends on how the other players are playing at your table. I used to raise a lot when I was playing, and I would get caught up in many more tough situations and lose most of the coin tosses. Since I have started keeping pots smaller and waiting till I have the nuts with redraws to any better nut draws before really becoming aggressive, I have noticed that I have been winning much more consistently.

I like disguising my hands more, because it makes it very difficult for my opponents to have any idea where I stand. But hey, thats just what has been working for me.

You are definitely right though here, I should have raised pre-flop and what they discussed in the video was more just about naked aces, not aces with a potential flush and straight draw.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 11:43 AM   #13
Administrator
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerJAH View Post
worth the money? too bad they don't let you see the video listing before becoming a member.
To be completely honest, Ryan Fisler (one of the instructors/owners) gave me a free trial so that I could write a review for them on my other site, so I am not spending anything. Though, I have done a lot of research on the different training sites, and it seems that they have the largest (or at least 2nd largest) collection of Omaha videos with 18.

I have watched a ton of their Holdem videos also, the ones by David Williams are pretty good, but there are a ton there to choose from.

I am going to write a proper review of them on my other site shortly, but for $25/month (or $150 for the whole year which works out to $12.xx) I would say it is definitely worth it for me, even if I was paying. Since watching them, I have made much more than that, and a lot of it I think is as a result of watching the videos.

You can see one of the sample vids here:
http://www.bankrollboost.com/poker/training/

I have looked at some of the other training sites like cardrunners and pokerxfactor and most of them have initiation fees which are higher than a whole year with RPT. I am sure their videos are great, but they also didn't have a good collection of Omaha videos, which is more what I was interested in.

Hope that helps.

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 01:51 PM   #14
Living Legend
 
BBC Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,079
Quote:
True, but I think that also depends on how the other players are playing at your table. I used to raise a lot when I was playing, and I would get caught up in many more tough situations and lose most of the coin tosses. Since I have started keeping pots smaller and waiting till I have the nuts with redraws to any better nut draws before really becoming aggressive, I have noticed that I have been winning much more consistently.
Variance and EV are different concepts.

Quote:
I like disguising my hands more
From what I can tell, you already play 75% of your hands.. I wouldnt worry about disguising anything.
__________________
13Cards is the worst thing to happen to Canadian Poker ever.
BBC Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30,2008, 02:53 PM   #15
Administrator
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC Z View Post
From what I can tell, you already play 75% of your hands.. I wouldnt worry about disguising anything.
That was before... I'm changing
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good results, but maybe a bad decision? jontm Brags, Beats & Variance 5 Mar 06,2010 01:25 PM
Preflop; good or bad play? Flop; good or bad play? Cerberus Analyze My Hand 8 Oct 06,2009 06:32 PM
How do you play against a good LAG. ReefAquarium No Limit / Pot Limit Holdem 6 Jan 06,2008 06:51 PM
stupid people make stupid drivers. Graham Off Topic Lounge 16 Dec 19,2006 08:29 AM
A donk play and a good play for analysis SirWatts Online Poker Talk 8 Dec 20,2005 07:21 AM

 
Top Sites
Winner Poker

250% up to $2,000
Bonus Code: Canada
 
PokerStars

$600 FREE
Marketing Code: PSA8177
 
Party Poker

100% up to $500 FREE
Bonus Code: CANADA2012
 

Poker Stars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Poker Forum Canada offers bonuses for many online poker sites. Party Poker Bonus Code is the best Canadian poker bonus with  Titan Poker Bonus Code being the second best and last but not least is PokerStars Marketing Code. Clearing the full bonus on each site will add a total of $1,700 in bonus cash to your online bankroll.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.