8Likes
Feb 01,2012, 09:56 PM
|
#1 | | Inhumano Forboon! | First hand FT
Std. shove? Is min raise call shorty's an option? Big stacks are reg's but not good enough to re-shove a wide range. Ever folding? I haven't put this in an ICM calc but I imagine a9s is a fold
Poker Stars, $7.34 + $0.66 NL Hold'em Tournament, 1,000/2,000 Blinds, 200 Ante, 9 Players
UTG+2: 49,221
MP1: 12,842
MP2: 43,016
CO: 13,187
BTN: 7,369
SB: 66,414
BB: 22,948
JodaB. (UTG): 30,868
UTG+1: 24,135 Pre-Flop: (4,800) T  A  dealt to JodaB. (UTG) JodaB 
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 10:13 PM
|
#2 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday Std. shove? Is min raise call shorty's an option? Big stacks are reg's but not good enough to re-shove a wide range. Ever folding? I haven't put this in an ICM calc but I imagine a9s is a fold
Poker Stars, $7.34 + $0.66 NL Hold'em Tournament, 1,000/2,000 Blinds, 200 Ante, 9 Players
UTG+2: 49,221
MP1: 12,842
MP2: 43,016
CO: 13,187
BTN: 7,369
SB: 66,414
BB: 22,948
JodaB. (UTG): 30,868
UTG+1: 24,135 Pre-Flop: (4,800) T  A  dealt to JodaB. (UTG) JodaB  | I doubt this is an ICM shove given stack sizes. Personally, without doing the math I would 2.1x and call a short shove. I can't min raise cuz I'm not cool enough.
It would also depend a bit on table dynamics but I'm not sure if you know that much mass tabling.
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
Last edited by GTA Poker; Feb 01,2012 at 10:15 PM.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 10:36 PM
|
#3 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker I doubt this is an ICM shove given stack sizes. Personally, without doing the math I would 2.1x and call a short shove. I can't min raise cuz I'm not cool enough. | now this range is not adjusted or necessarily correct but its the icm with a 180 man payout HoldemResources.net: Beta ICM Nash Calculator icm.JPG Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker It would also depend a bit on table dynamics but I'm not sure if you know that much mass tabling. | I am table dynamics
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
Last edited by darbday; Feb 01,2012 at 10:39 PM.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 10:55 PM
|
#4 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
|
rape it in
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 11:15 PM
|
#5 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
|
I didn't see the antes...I assume this is always a push/fold spot?
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 11:27 PM
|
#6 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker I didn't see the antes. | but its the ft Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker I assume this is always a push/fold spot? | yes....but....looking at the stack sizes and with the players that were here, its going to be close to optimal to raise fold to the big stacks and just call the shorty's.
I might need more chips and slightly different stack sizes...but i think its close since nobody will widen there range when I min raise, and the big stacks are only going to re-shove a range that dominates us
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 11:43 PM
|
#7 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday but its the ft
yes....but....looking at the stack sizes and with the players that were here, its going to be close to optimal to raise fold to the big stacks and just call the shorty's.
I might need more chips and slightly different stack sizes...but i think its close since nobody will widen there range when I min raise, and the big stacks are only going to re-shove a range that dominates us | That's was my first thought but aren't we giving up too large a %age of our stack by r/folding?
You would have to do the math by assigning a range to the large stacks that would shove on you and how frequently they would be dealt those hands and what you lose by r/f vs how often you steal then blinds and antes vs what you perceive as a shorty's reshove range and how you do against it when you call.
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 11:53 PM
|
#8 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker That's was my first thought but aren't we giving up too large a %age of our stack by r/folding? | In short yes, and in general yes, but i think its almost a question here because we have AT and the bigstack reshove ranges are AJs+ TT+ and never KQ. So we don't get the normal odds to call a 3bet shove because here AT is uber dominated not just beat by his range, the cards they reshove are bad for our specific hand....
And that min raising utg look really strong here so everyone ranges are maximally tight
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Feb 01,2012, 11:56 PM
|
#9 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
|
r/f could be fine fo sho, in a vacuum it's a shove just from the HH
|
| |
Feb 02,2012, 12:08 AM
|
#10 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday In short yes, and in general yes, but i think its almost a question here because we have AT and the bigstack reshove ranges are AJs+ TT+ and never KQ. So we don't get the normal odds to call a 3bet shove because here AT is uber dominated not just beat by his range, the cards they reshove are bad for our specific hand....
And that min raising utg look really strong here so everyone ranges are maximally tight | I don't play MTTS, but I am friends with a MTT pro and used to watch some of his online FTs.
Is UTG raise really perceived as strength these days? When I would watch him 1-2 years ago UTG was the new steal spot and I would think that players have adjusted to UTG raises with weaker shoves today.
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| |
Feb 02,2012, 12:10 AM
|
#11 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday In short yes, and in general yes, but i think its almost a question here because we have AT and the bigstack reshove ranges are AJs+ TT+ and never KQ. So we don't get the normal odds to call a 3bet shove because here AT is uber dominated not just beat by his range, the cards they reshove are bad for our specific hand....
And that min raising utg look really strong here so everyone ranges are maximally tight | I'd be interested in seeing the math on the 3 scenarios to calculate overall EV of min raising UTG, but it sounds like a large amount of work.
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| |
Feb 02,2012, 12:12 AM
|
#12 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker Is UTG raise really perceived as strength these days? | <^^> Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker I'd be interested in seeing the math on the 3 scenarios to calculate overall EV of min raising UTG, but it sounds like a large amount of work. | no one will ever do it, ha. actually people do it but its obv not fun. Best thing to do is to just ask a pro, keeping in mind any math done with icm is limited because icm has assumptions and approximations that make it not always correct....
maybe this problem is easier to solve than i describe tho
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
Last edited by darbday; Feb 02,2012 at 12:16 AM.
|
| |
Feb 02,2012, 12:19 AM
|
#13 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday <^^>
no one will ever do it, ha. actually people do it but its obv not fun. Best thing to do is to just ask a pro, keeping in mind any math done with icm is limited because icm has assumptions and approximations that make it not always correct....
maybe this problem is easier to solve than i describe tho | give me a hand %range shove from the big stacks and a hand %range shove from the short stacks and then we can figure it out
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| |
Feb 02,2012, 12:28 AM
|
#14 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker give me a hand %range shove from the big stacks and a hand %range shove from the short stacks and then we can figure it out | JodaB. (UTG): 30,868
UTG+1: 24,135 88, AJs+
UTG+2: 49,221 TT, AJs+
MP1: 12,842 77+, ATs+
MP2: 43,016 TT, AJs+
CO: 13,187 77+, ATs+
BTN: 7,369 55+ AT+ , KJs+,
SB: 66,414 TT, AJs+
BB: 22,948 77 , AJs+,
see you'd have to play around a lil. sometimes people will fold ajs. Some will re jam hands like 99 and ajo.
the bb will flat sometimes and check fold alot with hands like kq.
so we can argue and adjust but prob start there
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Feb 02,2012, 12:50 AM
|
#15 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,930
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday JodaB. (UTG): 30,868
UTG+1: 24,135 88, AJs+
UTG+2: 49,221 TT, AJs+
MP1: 12,842 77+, ATs+
MP2: 43,016 TT, AJs+
CO: 13,187 77+, ATs+
BTN: 7,369 55+ AT+ , KJs+,
SB: 66,414 TT, AJs+
BB: 22,948 77 , AJs+,
see you'd have to play around a lil. sometimes people will fold ajs. Some will re jam hands like 99 and ajo.
the bb will flat sometimes and check fold alot with hands like kq.
so we can argue and adjust but prob start there | will get this done tomorrow (hopefully)
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| | |