You have a new PM! Click here here to read it!

Go Back   Poker Forum Canada > Poker Forum > Poker Strategy > MTT Strategy

MTT Strategy This forum is for all tournament poker strategy for MTTs (Multi Table Tournaments).



Register Now!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 26,2010, 12:59 PM   #31
Inhumano Forboon!
 
darbday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 5,197

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by iNano78 View Post
In the first paragraph, I was talking about cash games. Outside of home games, I don't play many tourneys. That's why I mentioned tourneys in a separate paragraph. Your OP wasn't specific.

it was VERY specific....are you new
darbday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 26,2010, 01:31 PM   #32
Donk-hunter
 
iNano78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday View Post
it was VERY specific....are you new
Oops... I just realized this is in the "MTT Stretegy" section... so ya, 200xBB would be pretty awesome.

Given that info, you're probably playing in a lot of situations where you don't have sufficient implied odds to limp - let alone call a raise - with a small pair... unless maybe you have position and think you can steal the pot after the flop when you miss. But if that's the case, you don't need a small pair in your hand.
__________________
PM me for info on home games in Ottawa
iNano78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 26,2010, 01:38 PM   #33
Inhumano Forboon!
 
darbday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 5,197

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by iNano78 View Post
Oops... I just realized this is in the "MTT Stretegy" section... so ya, 200xBB would be pretty awesome.

Given that info, you're probably playing in a lot of situations where you don't have sufficient implied odds to limp - let alone call a raise - with a small pair... unless maybe you have position and think you can steal the pot after the flop when you miss. But if that's the case, you don't need a small pair in your hand.
right on, was just harrasin a little. i don't call alot of raise, just some min raise, and limp when i know the table will let me. happens alot. but i never check the odds, i just figure if i hit my set, ill likely make up for them.

still not sure...but thx for the input.
darbday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 11:41 AM   #34
Full PFC Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNano78 View Post
^^ this.

It's situation-dependent (position is key; other players' pre- and post-flop play is equally key; stack sizes are crucial), but I find set-mining is most profitable when I'm at least 200xBB deep and at least a few of my opponents are (a) also deep and (b) can't get away from TPTK and top two-pair type hands. Of course, when you're 200xBB deep, set-over-set smarts a bit... but c'est la poker.

If you're set-mining in tournaments when you have (or everyone else at your table has) M < 30, you have a leak in your game.
I like this strat for MTTs. I was allways curious when to play multi way for set mining value. I'd call 3xbb bets with low pps if it was multi-way and my M>15. TOTAL spite call no less, not deep enough to do this.

P.S.

If you two get into a poker fight together, can I play too?
syphilaids is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 08:08 PM   #35
Inhumano Forboon!
 
darbday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 5,197

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by syphilaids View Post
I like this strat for MTTs. I was allways curious when to play multi way for set mining value. I'd call 3xbb bets with low pps if it was multi-way and my M>15. TOTAL spite call no less, not deep enough to do this.

P.S.

If you two get into a poker fight together, can I play too?
i will win many tourneys without ever going over an m of thirty, and i seriously can't believe that you should never play pocket pairs to set mine without that high of a chip count, ive been doing it every chance i get with over 10 bbs
darbday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 08:20 PM   #36
Donk-hunter
 
iNano78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday View Post
i will win many tourneys without ever going over an m of thirty, and i seriously can't believe that you should never play pocket pairs to set mine without that high of a chip count, ive been doing it every chance i get with over 10 bbs
I think he was being sarcastic. I was talking about cash games there, and even in cash games its profitable with effective stacks from 40xBB and above. I just find set mining most profitable when deeper.

As for MTTs, 10xBB is really pushing it. That means you have to get an opponents entire stack (assuming they have you covered) > 85% of the times you flop a set - and that's also assuming the pot never gets raised behind you. And it's mathematically incorrect if your opponent in the hand has < 8.5xBB, unless you're in position and can bluff him off the pot often enough to make it profitable. You (and your opponent) should really have > 20xBB to make it profitable to set mine, based on getting his stack ~ 50% of the time (or winning half his stack, on average). If you're shorter stacked than that, treat small pairs as hands you can semi-bluff with occasionally (especially in position), throw them away when OOP, and emphasize playing hands with some showdown value.
__________________
PM me for info on home games in Ottawa

Last edited by iNano78; Feb 04,2010 at 08:22 PM.
iNano78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 08:25 PM   #37
Inhumano Forboon!
 
darbday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 5,197

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by iNano78 View Post
I think he was being sarcastic. I was talking about cash games there, and even in cash games its profitable with effective stacks from 40xBB and above. I just find set mining most profitable when deeper.

As for MTTs, 10xBB is really pushing it. That means you have to get an opponents entire stack (assuming they have you covered) > 85% of the times you flop a set - and that's also assuming the pot never gets raised behind you. And it's mathematically incorrect if your opponent in the hand has < 8.5xBB, unless you're in position and can bluff him off the pot often enough to make it profitable. You (and your opponent) should really have > 20xBB to make it profitable to set mine, based on getting his stack ~ 50% of the time. If you're shorter stacked than that, treat small pairs as hands you can semi-bluff with occasionally (especially in position), throw them away when OOP, and emphasize playing hands with some showdown value.
yes i do it with more then 10 bb, and hopefully have 20, and only if i believe strongly no one behind me will raise. basically we're on the same lines. was just wondering if you need a certain amount of limpers in the pot. it seems with everyone suggestions you can play it with limpers or with out with a decent stack. i don't like the play so much with a shorter stack like 12 bb but sometimes ill do it if i know its pretty much shove time and i can limp one last time first without going below 10bb.
darbday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 08:34 PM   #38
Full PFC Member
 
trigs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 810
cash games, i love to setmine (possibly to the point i may be over doing it, but as far as my stats go it`s been very profitable).

MTTs (which this thread is about) i don't like to do it too often. it definitely depends on the players i`m playing, their stack size, my stack size, position, my table image, etc. etc.
trigs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 09:05 PM   #39
Inhumano Forboon!
 
darbday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 5,197

PFC Tournament Wins
5 Wins Single Win Award 
Total Awards: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by trigs View Post
MTTs (which this thread is about) i don't like to do it too often. it definitely depends on the players i`m playing, their stack size, my stack size, position, my table image, etc. etc.
yup every decision for every play does.....

thanks for the help

Last edited by darbday; Feb 04,2010 at 09:11 PM.
darbday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 04,2010, 09:28 PM   #40
comma man
 
GTA Poker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,151
1. set mine

The act of sitting at a poker game and only playing when you hit trips.

Dude I was up till four in the morning trying to set mine on party poker...

/thread
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
GTA Poker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 05,2010, 05:09 PM   #41
Full PFC Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 597
I'm not sarcastic! I think inano's play is a good strat for pure set mining. Allways wondering what to do with 22 when facing a raise....
syphilaids is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pocket pairs preflop! rapz4lyfe No Limit / Pot Limit Holdem 14 Feb 18,2011 03:02 PM
Handling medium pocket pairs UnderTheGun MTT Strategy 4 Feb 28,2010 04:29 AM
Playing Pocket Pairs adpro Ask The Poker Pro - Archive: Read only 6 Sep 08,2008 06:31 PM
Pocket Pairs...raise pre-flop? mot98 Online Poker Talk 11 Nov 10,2005 06:50 PM
Low and Middle Pocket Pairs HellmuthFan Brags, Beats & Variance 7 May 16,2004 03:33 AM

 
Top Sites
Winner Poker

250% up to $2,000
Bonus Code: Canada
 
PokerStars

$600 FREE
Marketing Code: PSA8177
 
Party Poker

100% up to $500 FREE
Bonus Code: CANADA2012
 

Poker Stars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.

Poker Forum Canada offers bonuses for many online poker sites. Party Poker Bonus Code is the best Canadian poker bonus with  Titan Poker Bonus Code being the second best and last but not least is PokerStars Marketing Code. Clearing the full bonus on each site will add a total of $1,700 in bonus cash to your online bankroll.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.