|
Nov 18,2011, 03:50 PM
|
#16 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA Poker His ACTUAL range is ATC...do you mean his perceived range or a solid player's range? |
i think what you mean here is if we see villains in general show up with any cards like 97o ...j2s......T2o or whatever....that if we are up against a random then we can put him on atc.....
but really its more correct i think to give him a reasonable range like AA KK QQ AK....etc. keep it wide to like 99 or something....and then add a few wildcard hands knowing that villains will come up with air 'sometimes'.......
not sure if thats what you meant but i think alot of people skew the math
that way.....
edit: i don't have a source for that tho...
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
Last edited by darbday; Nov 18,2011 at 04:13 PM.
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:07 PM
|
#17 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,661
|
lets put it like this, folding QQ to a checkraise is a super specific read that we can't make with randoms
__________________
~Games are lost, games are won you'll find the strength to carry on~
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:17 PM
|
#18 | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 101
|
are we actually snap shoving here?
some how we dont put villian on AA, KK?
If this is a higher buy in mtt, i would tread very carefully as played.
folding ladies is pretty tough, but has to be done sometimes, especially in higher stake MTT's
Last edited by gettin daize; Nov 18,2011 at 04:21 PM.
Reason: not saying i would fold here, but villian looks super strong
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:20 PM
|
#19 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by gettin daize are we actually snap shoving here?
some how we dont put villian on AA, KK?
If this is a higher buy in mtt, i would tread very carefully as played.
folding ladies is pretty tough, but has to be done sometimes, especially in higher stake MTT's | its best we put villain on a range here...not one or two hands...
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:31 PM
|
#20 | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 101
|
so, his range doesnt have the 2 hands that crush us tho?
We ship it in, and he has us dominated and we say "gg" when we are pwnt and move on?
noted.
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:34 PM
|
#21 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by gettin daize so, his range doesnt have the 2 hands that crush us tho?
We ship it in, and he has us dominated and we say "gg" when we are pwnt and move on?
noted. | no....we put the range into poker stove....average the answer...and take the best option
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:38 PM
|
#22 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by gettin daize
If this is a higher buy in mtt, i would tread very carefully as played. | $4
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 04:55 PM
|
#23 | | Full PFC Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday but really its more correct i think to give him a reasonable range like AA KK QQ AK....etc. keep it wide to like 99 or something....and then add a few wildcard hands knowing that villains will come up with air 'sometimes'....... |
yes that was what I was thinking too, this maybe?
TT+,AQs+,JTs,T8s,98s,96s,AQo+
|
| |
Nov 18,2011, 05:47 PM
|
#24 | | #bonking
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 5,932
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday i think what you mean here is if we see villains in general show up with any cards like 97o ...j2s......T2o or whatever....that if we are up against a random then we can put him on atc.....
but really its more correct i think to give him a reasonable range like AA KK QQ AK....etc. keep it wide to like 99 or something....and then add a few wildcard hands knowing that villains will come up with air 'sometimes'.......
not sure if thats what you meant but i think alot of people skew the math
that way.....
edit: i don't have a source for that tho... | I am saying that THIS player's ACTUAL range is ATC (obv after the cards are flipped)...but if you want to assign an average player's range for this situation then that's different
ps -- I raise or 3 bet this spot all the time in live cash games from the blinds to build a pot to steal HU on later streets or to take it down pre...villain's post-flop line is insanely stupid
__________________
That level 5 trap really paid off...ship him the cookies.
|
| |
Nov 20,2011, 10:43 AM
|
#25 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Preflop
equity
Hand 0: 44.962% { TT+, AQs+, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 55.038% { QcQd }
*plus you can add some random air and expect to be somewhere around 60%
Postflop vs his cr range which won't really change much here because hes gonna check raise most of his over cards most of the time and same with over pairs......
Board: 3c 9h 6h
equity
Hand 0: 38.416% { TT+, AQs+, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 61.584% { QcQd }
If we think maybe villain doesn't check raise ak aq tt and jj as much then we are closer to a flip Postflop
Board: 3c 9h 6h
equity
Hand 0: 48.753% { QQ+, JcJd, JdJh, JhJs, AKs, AhQh, AsQs, AcKd, AcKh, AcKs,
AdKh, AdKs, AhKs, AcQd, AcQh, AcQs, AdQh, AdQs, AhQs }
Hand 1: 51.247% { QcQd }
But we still haven't accounted for the fact that villain shows air here sometimes and that theres is already money in the pot for a better deal on our money.
*obv villain can have 96s or something silly or a set but against his range...esp knowing its that wide we are still happy to get it in i think...
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| |
Nov 20,2011, 12:45 PM
|
#26 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Developing my inner shove monkey
Posts: 866
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gettin daize are we actually snap shoving here?
some how we dont put villian on AA, KK?
If this is a higher buy in mtt, i would tread very carefully as played.
folding ladies is pretty tough, but has to be done sometimes, especially in higher stake MTT's | Is this right though? If playing with proper BR MGMT shouldn't the buy in amount have no impact on the choice of play? Or are you more pointing to the fact that higher buy-in generally means higher quality villains?
|
| |
Nov 20,2011, 12:48 PM
|
#27 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by SuitedPair Is this right though? If playing with proper BR MGMT shouldn't the buy in amount have no impact on the choice of play? Or are you more pointing to the fact that higher buy-in generally means higher quality villains? | yes it changes the kinds of hands the villain could or would likely have is all..
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
|
| | |