Apr 26,2011, 05:54 PM
#1 Inhumano Forboon!
Is this what we do....?
Poker Stars, $11 + $1 NL Hold'em Tournament, 400/800 Blinds, 75 Ante, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com -
Hand History Converter
SB: 5,204
Yodabatman (BB): 13,898
UTG: 3,645
UTG+1: 6,300
UTG+2: 7,065
MP1: 16,550
MP2: 5,010
CO: 3,046
BTN: 2,720
Pre-Flop: (1,875) Q
6
dealt to Yodabatman (BB)
UTG raises to 3,570 and is All-In , 7 folds,
Yodabatman calls 2,770.....??
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
Apr 26,2011, 07:03 PM
#2 Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milton, poker capital of the world.. after Wloo that is.
Posts: 9,242
PFC Tournament Wins
So 2770 to win 6400 odd? better than 2-1? hmmm... Suited cards, you have big stack, his range is likely pretty wide.... I call... and apologize profusely...
Last edited by compuease; Apr 26,2011 at 07:06 PM .
Apr 26,2011, 08:12 PM
#3 Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Only 5445 in the pot if I'm mathing correctly, but yea call.
Apr 26,2011, 11:13 PM
#4 Full PFC Member
Snap it!!!
__________________
When the money is gone, its time to move on!!
Apr 27,2011, 04:36 AM
#5 Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Value city, seat 6
Posts: 568
i guess so, based on math alone...but man that sucks, just hope he has Q5?? or 44 or something
__________________
AKA it seems "The Wizard!!"....getem bad hoody!!
Apr 27,2011, 04:51 AM
#6 Full PFC Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,661
If I'm thinking correctly after just waking up we're calling 3,5 BBs to win 4,5+4,5+0,5+0,8ish
which means we need 3,5/(9+1,3)= 3,5/10,3= 34% equity. I think it's really hard for us not to have that
Apr 27,2011, 06:16 AM
#7 Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milton, poker capital of the world.. after Wloo that is.
Posts: 9,242
PFC Tournament Wins
Looks pretty well unanimouis Darb, even from the old tight guy. (even though my math was a little off..)
Apr 27,2011, 07:33 AM
#8 Inhumano Forboon!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
compuease Looks pretty well unanimouis Darb, even from the old tight guy. (even though my math was a little off..)
ya as soon as you were calling i knew i shouldn't have asked, lol. i mean i take this all day long, but i never really asked before so i thought its time to make sure i understand...just checking...nothing to see here.....
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
Apr 27,2011, 07:42 PM
#9 Mr. Wonderful
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Richard~ If I'm thinking correctly after just waking up we're calling 3,5 BBs to win 4,5+4,5+0,5+0,8ish
which means we need 3,5/(9+1,3)= 3,5/10,3= 34% equity. I think it's really hard for us not to have that
English please!
__________________
Always did the right thing and it feels good.
Apr 27,2011, 08:49 PM
#10 Looking for a coach
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by
darbday Poker Stars, $11 + $1 NL Hold'em Tournament, 400/800 Blinds, 75 Ante, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com -
Hand History Converter
SB: 5,204
Yodabatman (BB): 13,898
UTG: 3,645
UTG+1: 6,300
UTG+2: 7,065
MP1: 16,550
MP2: 5,010
CO: 3,046
BTN: 2,720
Pre-Flop: (1,875) Q
6
dealt to Yodabatman (BB)
UTG raises to 3,570 and is All-In , 7 folds,
Yodabatman calls 2,770.....??
I clearly don't understand why there is a question.
UTG's range is a red card or a black card, your calling range is a little more than deuce and the cut card.
A more interesting question might be what the minimum that you would need to call. I'm certainly calling with K2o, Q5o, J8o.
T7o is probably a call here.
I probably fold 83o.
__________________
Not smarter than a grade 5 or Kristy Sea
Apr 27,2011, 08:54 PM
#11 Inhumano Forboon!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ReefAquarium I clearly don't understand why there is a question.
i just should have asked it a year ago, sometimes i don't know if i just make up things or theyre true......
just checking...
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
Apr 27,2011, 09:02 PM
#12 Looking for a coach
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by
philliivey English please!
If he has AcKd and we have 7h2s, we have 33% equity.
Even with 7h2s we are only a slight dog against almost the very top of his range. And his range is a red card or a black card.
7h2s is 34.6% against a random hand.
If he has AcKd and we have something a bit better than 72o like... 8h5s, we have 36% equity. so we call.
Should we bother looking at are cards first?
__________________
Not smarter than a grade 5 or Kristy Sea
Apr 27,2011, 09:18 PM
#13 Mr. Wonderful
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ReefAquarium If he has AcKd and we have 7h2s, we have 33% equity.
Even with 7h2s we are only a slight dog against almost the very top of his range. And his range is a red card or a black card.
7h2s is 34.6% against a random hand.
If he has AcKd and we have something a bit better than 72o like... 8h5s, we have 36% equity. so we call.
Should we bother looking at are cards first?
Yes, otherwise how would you know you had the 30% ish equity that you need, ZING!
__________________
Always did the right thing and it feels good.
Apr 27,2011, 10:58 PM
#14 I got my flippy floppies!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Interior, BC
Posts: 2,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Richard~ If I'm thinking correctly after just waking up we're calling 3,5 BBs to win 4,5+4,5+0,5+0,8ish
which means we need 3,5/(9+1,3)= 3,5/10,3= 34% equity. I think it's really hard for us not to have that
Math is idiotic.
__________________
I am not on tilt, you're just a f*cking idiot.
Apr 29,2011, 11:42 AM
#15 Full PFC Member
any 2 will do here haha
__________________
When the money is gone, its time to move on!!