Vekked

Bet/call the AQ otf. Check/shove as played. You're not just worried about folding out worse hands but also you wanna get value while you can still rep a wide-ish range of draws and stuff and so a 9 or T or club doesn't come on the turn and make him shutdown with his worse 1 pairs.

Your range for calling pre is too tight and range for 3-betting is too loose in most cases (unless you have reads that he 3-bets 77/88/QJo. Can't see stacks very well to know if calling JJ pre is best or not in the first hand, but yea c/c'ing Kxx boards is best.

darbday

yes and i do this vs any decent player. here with 10bbs this guy called pre rather than jamming, which no matter what hand he has is just silly. So I couldn't care less, im not folding obv, and the read I had was that hes weak and passive...so more often than not I will get it in on the flop, i really felt like he would fold with aggression and get it in if i checked, but a check jam would be more standard too for sure....


not sure if your refering to the last hand with the villain calling with 10bbs left. my range here is that he has some kind of decent hand, and may be setting minning all pairs.....but it doesn't really matter cause were getting it in.....or was it a different calling range you mean?

no the range is really aq+,tt+, but i also add 99 because i don't want the range to be to tight. i also add kqs and ajs because the general field is a little loose and bad (well thats not soo bad though).

qjo was just an example to show how we can sometimes blow the villain off the good parts of his range.... if we use an accurate range I always add a little bluff to the numbers. Anyways its not really in his range no....



ya its kinda good you can't see the stacks lol, i didn't consider them when i picked the hand, ive been looking for a hand like this to use as an example but my problem was finding a hand with the correct stack sizes.


your turn for a vid

__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.