| 
Dec 04,2011, 11:27 AM
|
#16 | | +EV
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 74
|
I really doubt he hit the flush on the turn, as jamming out an all-in there is basically his least profitable option (next to folding, of course.)
I would think I agree on he either has a set or maybe even AQ/KQ, and just wants to make you pay to draw to the fourth diamond.
| 
|  | |
Dec 04,2011, 12:01 PM
|
#17 | | +EV
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 74
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday  tells us we are likely ahead....especially getting a good price on our money were prob happy to get it in...? | I think he meant the data didn't help us because A) you have cards that are in the flop possibly in the villains hand, and B) you didn't put in the math after the turn.
| |
| | |
Dec 11,2011, 11:29 AM
|
#18 | | Full PFC Member |
So we snap called him? then what happened? haha
__________________
When the money is gone, its time to move on!!
| |
| | |
Dec 11,2011, 11:44 AM
|
#19 | | Inhumano Forboon! | Quote:
Originally Posted by masterplan I think he meant the data didn't help us because A) you have cards that are in the flop possibly in the villains hand, and B) you didn't put in the math after the turn. | why would i do that 
not claiming this helps, makes sense, or is right....
Board: 6d 5d Qs 4d
Eq
Hand 0: 44.215% { AdQh }
Hand 1: 55.785% { 66-55, KQs, KdJd, KdTd, QdJd, JdTd, Td9d, 9d8d,
8d7d, AcKd, AdKc, AdKh, AdKs, AhKd, AsKd,
KcQd, KdQc, KdQh, KdQs, KhQd, KsQd }
So we might even think we are behind vs. his range but the pot odds will surely make up for that. Plus we can give some random air to his range and feel like its a snap call.
__________________
I think I'll just get it in bad here and chalk it up to variance.
| |
| | |
Dec 11,2011, 04:50 PM
|
#20 | | Full PFC Member |
so I used my full minute to think about it, weighed the options and decided to live to play another hand and dumped it.
I appreciate the input from everyone by the way.. Been very absent from the board since posting but will be going over the full thread in the next day or two and see just how chicken I really was
__________________
"I'd rather shoot for the moon and miss than aim for the gutter and make it" -Danny Trejo-
| |
| | |
Dec 11,2011, 09:41 PM
|
#21 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 182
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darbday why would i do that
not claiming this helps, makes sense, or is right....
Board: 6d 5d Qs 4d
Eq
Hand 0: 44.215% { AdQh }
Hand 1: 55.785% { 66-55, KQs, KdJd, KdTd, QdJd, JdTd, Td9d, 9d8d,
8d7d, AcKd, AdKc, AdKh, AdKs, AhKd, AsKd,
KcQd, KdQc, KdQh, KdQs, KhQd, KsQd }
So we might even think we are behind vs. his range but the pot odds will surely make up for that. Plus we can give some random air to his range and feel like its a snap call. | Put 87 with 1 diamond, 7d7x and 8d8x in their range and see how it changes.
Not that I think a lot villains ranges exist solely in that range, but I think we have to include it in villains range.
With dead money, it may still be a call. But I stay with my first position of it is a very close fold.
| |
| | |
