Jan 16,2010, 02:00 PM
|
#1 |
| Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
| These hands always get me...
*********** # 24 **************
PokerStars Game #38254147481: Tournament #232836239, $2.00+$0.20 USD Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2010/01/16 12:15:36 CT [2010/01/16 13:15:36 ET]
Table '232836239 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: MinJonesie (1740 in chips)
Seat 2: bluesplint (1260 in chips)
bluesplint: posts small blind 10
MinJonesie: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to MinJonesie [8c 2d]
bluesplint: calls 10
MinJonesie: checks
*** FLOP *** [Ad Jc Td]
MinJonesie: checks
bluesplint: checks
*** TURN *** [Ad Jc Td] [8h]
MinJonesie: checks
bluesplint: checks
*** RIVER *** [Ad Jc Td 8h] [8s]
MinJonesie: checks
bluesplint: bets 80
MinJonesie: raises 80 to 160
bluesplint: raises 80 to 240
MinJonesie: raises 1480 to 1720 and is all-in
bluesplint: calls 1000 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (480) returned to MinJonesie
*** SHOW DOWN ***
MinJonesie: shows [8c 2d] (three of a kind, Eights)
bluesplint: shows [Jd Jh] (a full house, Jacks full of Eights)
bluesplint collected 2520 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2520 | Rake 0
Board [Ad Jc Td 8h 8s]
Seat 1: MinJonesie (big blind) showed [8c 2d] and lost with three of a kind, Eights
Seat 2: bluesplint (button) (small blind) showed [Jd Jh] and won (2520) with a full house, Jacks full of Eights
Reminds me of Rounders. Although, in Rounders, Mat should have know given the guy was a great player and the hands played are of higher value.
I'm not one of these people who say that loose players are hard to beat, but in this case, the guy was tighter but I forced him to play looser.
I probably should have re-raised and then called.
Given what I said, sany thoughts would be appreciated. Especially my comment about "the guy was tighter but I forced him to play looser". Any analysis one that comment would be well recieved. |
| |