|
Nov 12,2008, 03:36 AM
|
#1 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 61
| Illegal clubs vs Legal casino Poker rooms: The rake doesn't add up
I was playing at Rama a few weeks ago. I overheard an interesting conversation between a player and one of the managers. The Manager said that basically poker rooms do not make any money at the casino. Th only reason they were used was kind of a "loss leader" for the casino. E.g. you play poker and your wife/friend/girlfriend blows a lot of money on slots while you play.
Compare that with these illegal downtown Toronto clubs that are getting busted. According to the reports, police were seizing thousands of dollars from 1 poker club.
Now I know an established casino has a bit more overhead, like Managers and waitresses but can legal poker rooms really be losing money? or are illegal poker rooms, really not making much? I know the stakes at most of those card rooms are 1-2NL which is similar to casinos. Shouldn't both be making money?
|
| |
Nov 12,2008, 04:51 AM
|
#2 | | CPF's super Donk
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Bradford
Posts: 3,664
|
In most clubs the dealers etc work for tips. I believe most casinos underestimate the revenue brought in by poker. At fallsview for example each table brings in $120/hr. As a player making a minimum of $12/hr is not easy which you need to do just to break even.
__________________
Kristy, why can't we all just get along  ?
|
| |
Nov 12,2008, 05:58 AM
|
#3 | | Cash games are evil!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
Ontario casinos should up their rake to help reduce the wait times; if the demand is so high in any case, the increased rake will help justify the poker rooms existence at the casino and save players having to wait around hours to play. most clubs have a higher rake than casinos. As a recreational player, I don't mind paying a higher rake to play for a couple hours while I'm at Niagara vs having to wait three hours for my name to get called. I realize this won't be a popular option for the regulars at Niagara where rake can make a difference between a profit and loss.
__________________
Vegas June 15 -19
|
| |
Nov 12,2008, 07:15 AM
|
#4 | | tu ne cede malis
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 348
|
Poker rooms make money I'm sure, but they make less than filling the room with slot machines would. Depending on the level of slot machine, possibly a lot less. That's where the idea of it being a 'loss leader' comes in.
They are in some ways counting on you taking some of your winnings and hitting the blackjack/craps/whatever, in addition to the wife/gf thing.
|
| |
Nov 12,2008, 07:32 AM
|
#5 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Churchill, Ontario
Posts: 381
|
While marketing the Fat Diamond automated poker table, I had many conversations with casino managers. In fact the poker rooms do make money, just not enough to justify the floor space when compared to slots. They are maintained for the "lost leader" value. A slot machine makes over $300.00 per hour on average I was told time and time again. Not one to accept things out of hand I took a stopwatch and timed a number of players at slot machines. The range of play was 6 plays per miniute for an older lady putting quarters in 3 at a time on an old machine, to 18 plays per minute $2.00 per play on a video style slot machine. Consider that they get 17% in Ontario and more in some States and you will see why they want the slots.
__________________
Pesky birds... I hate poker.
|
| |
Nov 12,2008, 02:44 PM
|
#6 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 135
| Quote:
Originally Posted by screenman "lost leader" v | loss leader. otherwise, good post.
|
| |
Nov 14,2008, 06:39 PM
|
#7 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6
|
Filling the room with slot machines can't be the answer or they would have done it. I've never walked through a casino and seen all the slots in use. They've built these big palaces, they must be making money on everything in them.
|
| |
Nov 14,2008, 07:01 PM
|
#8 | | Peace |
The question is not are they making $$$ from the poker room, it's how much more could they make with whatever they replace it with? I think the main reason they keep them is to attract the broadest group of degens possible, and then hope to catch some of the "spillage" while players wait for a seat, head to the john, exit, theatre, etc.
__________________
I don't gamble . . . but I will bet.
|
| |
Nov 15,2008, 02:33 PM
|
#9 | | Limit Donkey/NLHE Fish
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 861
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rockspark Filling the room with slot machines can't be the answer or they would have done it. I've never walked through a casino and seen all the slots in use. They've built these big palaces, they must be making money on everything in them. | It's not about making money it's about making the most $$$
Poker may make $120 an hour but that's low compared to most other table games and certainly slots.
So it's a matter of degrees, if you had the choice between making $300 an hour, or $120 an hour.. Which would you prefer?
__________________
"...the monkey looks to make sure we are not playing limit at Brantford." - Redington
|
| |
Nov 19,2008, 05:01 PM
|
#10 | | Wannabe a Xuan Liu!
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Triple range merging online
Posts: 3,098
| Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerJAH Ontario casinos should up their rake to help reduce the wait times | WAT??
Just because the Ontario casinos are burdened with bad gambling regulations and management doesn't run the poker rooms as well as the casinos in New York, Nevada, western Canada, etc. doesn't mean you should ask to be raped with a higher rake! A higher rake will only result in more losers, while the same player-unfriendly regulations and procedures will keep 100 players waiting while there are 10 empty tables.
__________________
May your EV always be positive.
|
| |
Nov 19,2008, 06:51 PM
|
#11 | | Cash games are evil!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,967
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BlondeFish WAT??
Just because the Ontario casinos are burdened with bad gambling regulations and management doesn't run the poker rooms as well as the casinos in New York, Nevada, western Canada, etc. doesn't mean you should ask to be raped with a higher rake! A higher rake will only result in more losers, while the same player-unfriendly regulations and procedures will keep 100 players waiting while there are 10 empty tables. | I guess the rule of supply and demand does not apply to the poker rooms. I knew that would get you going.
__________________
Vegas June 15 -19
|
| |
Nov 20,2008, 10:27 AM
|
#12 | | Seat 7
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 825
| Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerJAH I guess the rule of supply and demand does not apply to the poker rooms. I knew that would get you going. | Free market in-elastic non-masacistic consumers should NOT ask poorly-run-under-supplying-government-run-monopolies to apply supply/demand "rules".
pokerJAH is obviously a 13cards gimmick account!
__________________
-- Michael
Luck is just probability taken personally!
|
| |
Nov 20,2008, 10:36 AM
|
#13 | | Cash games are evil!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,967
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyHoldem pokerJAH is obviously a 13cards gimmick account! | yes, I love arguing with myself... I aint no rocco!
__________________
Vegas June 15 -19
|
| |
Nov 20,2008, 10:49 AM
|
#14 | | Seat 7
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 825
| Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerJAH yes, I love arguing with myself... | You're not helping your case!
__________________
-- Michael
Luck is just probability taken personally!
|
| |
Nov 20,2008, 04:24 PM
|
#15 | | Full PFC Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 114
| Quote:
Originally Posted by screenman Consider that they get 17% in Ontario and more in some States and you will see why they want the slots. |
Are you saying the payback on slots in
Ontario is 83% ?? Where did you get this number ??
|
| | |