Graham

Hey David,

What do you think the biggest mistakes many poker players make, which lead to them not being profitable? Also, what was the best advice anyone ever gave you, which has helped you make the most money playing poker?

Graham

GhettoFabolous

the best advice anyone ever gave me was AJK hoosier/belowabove's explanations of when i should open, it was the first time i really started learning how to read stack sizes rather then just playing completely by feel. It made me a lot more consistent. I also think this is the biggest mistake that people make, they either dont manage their stack properly given their stack size and number of big blinds, or they don't read their opponents big blinds properly when trying to assign their opponents ranges.

GF

BBC Z

Folding obv.

__________________
13Cards is the worst thing to happen to Canadian Poker ever.

Kristy_Sea

Graham posting in this section always reminds me of the high school teacher who saves the day after a guest speaker asks "any questions?" to hear crickets.

Ghetto, could you possibly elaborate on your earlier post?

Chuckieland

is this for cash games or for tournment?
cash game - biggest mistake, learn how to fold, and learn how to bluff.
Tourny- can't tell you, i'm a losing player at tournment.
P.S: i think i play tourny good, i just can't win that important all-in. one that if you win, i'll be in really good position to take down the tourny, but will out or consider out if you lose.

pokerJAH

biggest mistakes I see in cash games are: bluffing at the wrong time (bad board or bad position) or against the wrong player (i.e calling station), the desperation push (running low on chips so pushing with any pair, Ax, etc.), and not using position to their advantage. Also, falling in love with top pair.

__________________
Vegas June 15 -19

Pantsonfire

My vote would simply be a lack of discipline. Most players are simply way too loose and don't have the patience to wait for the right opportunities.

You may ask what about loose aggressive play? Well loose aggressive play actually takes even more discipline because to be successful at LAG play you need to spot a whole lot of right opportunities and that takes exceptional observation and skill.

__________________
"Let me be clear, I don't have a drug problem, I have a police problem"
-Keith Richards

herschelw

Chuckie,

You're definitly right about cash games and the need for players to learn to fold. One of the huge problems I see with tournament players trying to play cash games is they dont fold enough. In cash games you have to fold often when you feel you could be ahead. Calling to often is a massive error. Late in tournament play folding too much is a huge error and if you feel there's a decent chance you may be ahead you have to call many times in marginal spots.

Your P.S. statement is the comment I hear constantly from people who come to me for coaching. 99% of the time(not an exageration I really mean 99% of the time) you're failing to pick up chips in spots where a better player would and in turn when you lose that key race or get bad beat you dont have the chips left to recover. Where as someone who accumulated chips better would be able to come back from the unlucky situation often. Let's try a question that will demonstrate my point. Let's say you're in the mid stages of the $50 buyin $50k guar on stars and you have a 35BB stack how often do you plan to be stealing from utg and utg+1?


BTW, please forgive me in advance for putting you on the spot. I'm here to help you all get better not to be a dick.


As to your question about whether it's for cash games or tournaments, David exclusively teaches and primarily plays tournaments. I've played mtt's profesionally for two years. In January switched to full ring NL cash games. I had pretty much never played cash before and was awful at it. I took 2 lessons with an NL cash pro right at the beginning because I felt I was missing something. He helped me get the mindset figured out and I quickly got full ring figured out. I made $10k at 200NL(and a very small number of hands at 400NL) in January at full ring and now am regularly playing 400NL and 600NL on stars and ftp and 1000NL on cakepoker(all full ring). I'll be happy to answer mtt or cash game questions. I also am pretty well known for teaching 45man strategy as well so I'll be happy to answer questions on that too.

Archinutz

Lack of patience is what i think you were trying to point out. Please correct me if i'm wrong. Pretty well self explanatory...nuff said

DrTyore

This is the point at which I became officially super-extra-ultra excited about the new addition to the forum!

(Though if you could be convinced to be a dick and max. laughs- as well as just posting staightforward responses sans the forum-norm amount of ass kissing, that'd be hot too.)

WTG Graham and welcome to the forum Herschelw!

Will you please explain the 'mindset' difference between cash and tourney that you mentioned?


Edit: GOD D@#M F#@#$ng Computer!!!!!!!

By Kristy_Sea

__________________
Life's usually simple, just not always easy

herschelw

To me the biggest difference in mindset can be summed up as this:

tournament play = "When in doubt raise or reraise"

Cash game play = "When in doubt fold or call"


Granted as tournament players become more focused on pot control and the online structures get better and better they do to some degree converge in terms of the way we have to think about tournament play vs cash game play. By converge I mean that the two mindsets become more alike.

I'm sure that explanation is both oversimplified in a way and also sort of difficult to understand but it's my best attempt to explain what I'm talking about without writing a 5 page essay.

adpro

I started out playing ring games, then read Roy Rounders books on tournament play and all that. They seemed to help me a lot. Have you read these books? What do you think about them? EDIT: After reading these books I switched to playing tournament games. I wasn't all that successfully in ring games, but I was just learning.

Basically for tournaments (8-10 man) he pretty much says to be super tight pre-flop and when you hit a big hand, be super aggressive (like all-in aggressive when you know people will call you). Then near the end of the tournament loosen up a bit and start stealing some blinds when they players get tighter (usually when there are 5 or less). At this time the blinds are quite a bit bigger, so stealing them ends up raising your stack quite a bit.

I have been playing like this and I have been winning most of the tournaments I go in. I am playing for very small stakes at stars at the moment in order to learn, cause I literally just started playing poker. But, I seem to be pretty successful and can't wait to increase my bankroll to get to those higher stakes games.

From a beginner standpoint, and a side-note, I personally think, from my experiences anyway, the biggest mistake must be people playing in stakes that are too large for their bankroll.

Here is my question though, since I am curious.

What do you think the reason for the difference between play in ring games and tournaments? Is it the way players play? Is it because you are going to get way more callers in a tournament? Is it because tournament players are way looser than ring game players? Or, is it because people play more hands in tournaments?

Thanks for the advice though. We really appreciate it!

Pantsonfire

I am not going to replace expert advice but I think I can come up with two very apparent reasons.

First, the blind levels in a tournament increase and thus you are going to find yourself in an increasingly desparate situation as the tourney goes along. As a side result of this, stack sizes in tournaments mean quite a bit with regard to how you should play and how your opponents are likely to be playing. Thus, you will need to make plays that you would never make in a cash game and the plays you make are closely related to stack sizes and blind levels (along with other secondary considerations like average stack size, number of players left, payout structure, etc.).

Second, when you lose all your chips your tournament is over (assuming no rebuys of course). Thus, the decisions when you or your opponent are putting in all the chips take on a different meaning than in a cash game where you simply reload if hit the felt.

__________________
"Let me be clear, I don't have a drug problem, I have a police problem"
-Keith Richards

Pantsonfire

I was just doing some reading and I thought of something else regarding cash vs tourney that is really important. As a quick example, say the first hand of a sitngo you fold and all 9 others go allin. One guy wins and you are now heads up but you just made second place money by folding one hand.

In a cash game, if you are out of the hand, you have no investment in what happens to the opponents who are in it. In a tourney, even if you have folded, you have a investment in the hand. As an easy example, if one player knocks out another your chances have improved and thus your "equity" in the tourney has improved.

This leads to some interesting considerations. In a cash game, if a player moved all-in heads up preflop on you and then turned over his AKs and you had QQ, you would call every time. It would be a clearly winning play regardless of the blinds or the action to that point. However, in a tourney, this is not always the case. Winning the most money is the goal of both games. But in a tourney, sometimes folding as a 55% favourite would actually win you more money in the long run. This is due to the prize structure and bubble situations and the nonlinearity of chip values in tournament play.

This can be shown using an extreme example (one that is highly unlikely but clear in the math). There are three players, you have 1100 chips and the other two players have 1,000,000 chips. First prize is $10,000, second is $3000 and third is $0. The blinds are 500/1000 and you post the big blind and have 100 chips left. Here is the surprise. The button moves in and SB calls!!. You have to realize that you don't even have to look at your cards here and that you need to fold. You have an overwhelming lock on second place and $3000. If the two big stacks were normal players, you would have virtually no hope of reaching second place. If you call, even with AA, there is lower percentage of reaching second than if you fold.

This sort of thing is generally hard to grasp especially when situations aren't as clear cut as the above. But from the moment a tournament starts, every chip you lose has more value than a chip you win. At the beginning this is a very small factor but gets bigger as the tourney goes on and jumps when the bubble approachs and again as players in the money start to get eliminated and the payout structure comes into play.

__________________
"Let me be clear, I don't have a drug problem, I have a police problem"
-Keith Richards

adpro

Yeah, I see what you mean for sure. I think that's why I like tournament play a lot better. I'm all about minimizing losses and taking as many chips as I can when I am able to. I always try to get only one caller when I have a big hand and try to maximize my odds when I am actually trying to get a bunch of chips from someone.

However, on the other hand, I like the fast heads up games too. A lot more hands are played, obviously, and it is a fast thinking fun time. I always play 1 or 2 heads up games after a tournament. It gives me a lot of confidence with my heads up in tournies.

Either way, thank you for the insight. I can see a huge difference now. I guess I just didn't think too much about it and haven't played in ring games in so long. Maybe I'll give them a shot again when I increase my bankroll to a comfortable spot.